Design/Build
Designing and building a facility is a complex process, but the Design-Build approach simplifies the experience by bringing key project responsibilities together under one source. From the initial concept through completion and occupancy, CD Barnes can help coordinate the process, improve communication, and streamline project delivery.
One Source of Responsibility
With Design-Build, one trusted team guides the project from concept to completion. This approach can provide:
-
Building Needs Assessment – Evaluate your goals, space requirements, and overall project needs.
-
Architectural & Engineering Services – Coordinate the architectural and engineering professionals needed to develop the project.
-
Financing Assistance – Help identify and coordinate financing options for the project.
-
Site Selection – Assist in identifying and evaluating potential sites.
-
Site Testing & Due Diligence – Coordinate necessary site testing and investigations.
-
Site Planning & Zoning – Help navigate site planning, zoning, and related requirements.
-
Subcontractor Management – Select, coordinate, and manage the subcontractors necessary to complete the project.
By bringing these responsibilities together under one team, the Design-Build process can reduce communication gaps, streamline decision-making, and help sav
FASTER TRACK, LOWER STRESS
On average, Design/Build projects are completed significantly faster than those built with traditional methods. Depending on the circumstances, the speed alone can drastically lower your costs and stress. Other stress-reducing factors include a more cooperative spirit among the construction team. Lines of responsibility and communication are clear. All parties work according to the same contract, so there’s less reason to haggle, fewer misunderstandings, and a greater level of teamwork than with other methods. As you might expect, such teamwork and clarity aid in keeping quality high.
WHAT ABOUT COST?
Final Design/Build costs tend to be competitive with those of similar, traditionally constructed buildings. Note that we said “final costs,” and not “bids.” The Design/Build method is likely to yield realistic cost projections, based on careful consideration of what risks are associated with the project. Hard-dollar, competitive bids, the kind that you get in traditional general contracting, aren’t quite so realistic. Sometimes they are nowhere near the actual, final project cost.It is also worth noting, that in the Design/Build process, the architect works closely with the contractor and tends to design with cost in mind.
IS DESIGN/BUILD RIGHT FOR YOU?
If you are short on time and already have enough to worry about, the Design/Build method may be ideal for you. On the other hand, if you have time to manage the project and you are (a) experienced in supervising construction, (b) prefer a more hands-on arrangement, or (c) face a low-bid requirement, you may prefer the traditional General Contracting approach.We also offer Construction Management services, which can offer you more control and responsibility, while maintaining the many advantages of a close owner/contractor relationship.